{
  "blockers": [],
  "checks": {
    "all_specialist_decisions_pass": true,
    "article_has_citations_and_attribution": true,
    "attrition_reconciled": true,
    "claim_ledger_complete": true,
    "data_provenance_complete": true,
    "figure_contract_matches_analysis": true,
    "freshness": true,
    "limitations_disclosed": true,
    "minimum_sample": true,
    "no_blocking_review_findings": true,
    "standalone_distribution_copy": true,
    "temporal_validation": true,
    "uncertainty_reported": true
  },
  "decided_at": "2026-08-31T23:05:21.800855+00:00",
  "editor_note": "All mechanical gates pass and no blocking specialist finding remains. Headline, dek, figure titles, and email copy each stand alone with population, outcome, and time frame; central numbers (649 pairs, 2.65 vs 2.34 TD MAE, 11.7% improvement, 8.3-to-5.3 quintile decline, 0.31 TD delta with 0.18-0.45 CI) trace exactly to the analysis and figure contracts. Survivor bias, non-causal scope, and within-sample bootstrap framing are disclosed and preserved adjacent to the claims. The article appropriately positions the finding as a weak tiebreaker for fantasy managers rather than a projection.",
  "gate_version": "1.0",
  "passed": true
}